Guidelines for Adult Immunisation

Future Vaccines

Clostridioides difficile

Introduction

Clostridioides difficile (formerly Clostridium difficile) infection (CDI) is a major cause of antibiotic-associated diarrhoea and colitis and remains one of the most common pathogens in healthcare-associated infections. The spectrum of CDI ranges from asymptomatic carriage and mild diarrhoea to life-threatening pseudomembranous colitis, toxic megacolon, and fulminant colitis. 

Long-term symptom resolution is difficult to achieve for many patients; approximately 20% experience recurrent infections after initially responding to therapy. Although traditionally associated with antibiotic use in healthcare settings, CDI has increasingly occurred in the community since the emergence of hypervirulent strains in the early 2000s.

CDI is mainly mediated by the protein exotoxins toxin A (TcdA) and toxin B (TcdB). Antibodies to TcdA and TcdB confer protection against primary and recurrent CDI. 

Vaccines

Vaccine candidates targeting TcdA and TcdB may prevent clinical illness but do not prevent gastrointestinal tract colonisation. This has generated interest in targeting non-toxin pathogenic factors such as binary toxin (CDT), cell-surface antigens, spore-coat antigens, and flagella. Alternative C. difficile antigens show potential as immunogenic targets and novel pathways for vaccine development and are currently under pre-clinical investigation. Other considerations include the cross-reactivity of antibodies to antigens across different C. difficile strains, the need for the most suitable type of adjuvants, the optimal age for immunisation, demonstrating immune responses in high-risk elderly individuals, and the duration of protection.

Table 29.6 Clostridioides difficile candidate vaccines

References

  1. Bézay,c N., Ayad, A., Dubischar, K., et al. (2016). Safety, immunogenicity and dose response of VLA84, a new vaccine candidate against Clostridium difficile, in healthy volunteers. Vaccine, 34(23),2585–2592. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2016.03.098
  2. de Bruyn, G., Gordon, D. L., Steiner, T., et al. (2020). Safety, immunogenicity, and efficacy of a Clostridioides difficile toxoid vaccine candidate: A phase 3 multicentre, observer-blind, randomised, controlled trial. The Lancet Infectious Diseases https://doi.org/10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30331-5
  3. de Bruyn, G., Saleh, J., Workman, D., et al. & H-030-012 Clinical Investigator Study Team (2016). Defining the optimal formulation and schedule of a candidate toxoid vaccine against Clostridium difficile infection: A randomized Phase 2 clinical trial. Vaccine, 34(19), 2170–2178.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2016.03.028
  4. Henderson, M., Bragg, A., Fahim, G., Shah, M., & Hermes-DeSantis, E. R. (2017). A Review of the Safety and Efficacy of Vaccines as Prophylaxis for Clostridium difficile Vaccines, 5(3), 25. https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines5030025
  5. Kitchin, N., Remich, S. A., Peterson, J., et al. (2020). A Phase 2 Study Evaluating the Safety, Tolerability, and Immunogenicity of Two 3-Dose Regimens of a Clostridium difficile Vaccine in Healthy US Adults Aged 65 to 85 Years. Clinical Infectious Diseases 70(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciz153
  6. Kociolek, L. K., & Gerding, D. N. (2016). Breakthroughs in the treatment and prevention of Clostridium difficile Nature reviews. Gastroenterology & Hepatology, 13(3), 150–160. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrgastro.2015.220
  7. Sheldon, E., Kitchin, N., Peng, Y., et al. (2016). A phase 1, placebo-controlled, randomized study of the safety, tolerability, and immunogenicity of a Clostridium difficile vaccine administered with or without aluminum hydroxide in healthy adults. Vaccine, 34(18),2082–2091. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2016.03.010
  8. Wang, J., Ma, Q., & Tian, S. (2025). Against Clostridioides difficile Infection: An Update on Vaccine Development. Toxins, 17(5), 222. https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins17050222
  9. Donskey, C. J., Dubberke, E. R., Klein, N. P., et al. (2024). CLOVER (CLOstridium difficile Vaccine Efficacy tRial) Study: A Phase 3, Randomized Trial Investigating the Efficacy and Safety of a Detoxified Toxin A/B Vaccine in Adults 50 Years and Older at Increased Risk of Clostridioides difficile Infection. Clinical Infectious Diseases 79(6), 1503–1511. https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciae410
  10. Vincent B. Young. (2025). Vaccinating against Clostridioides difficile Infection. N Engl J Med; 392:1237-1240. https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMcibr2413794
  11. Alameh, M.G., Semin, A., Bayard, NU., et al. (2024). A multivalent mRNA-LNP vaccine protects against Clostridioides difficile infection. Science 386,69-75. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.adn4955
  12. Riley, T.V.; Lyras, D.; Douce, G.R. (2019). Status of Vaccine Research and Development for Clostridium difficile. Vaccine, 37, 7300–7306. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2019.02.052
  13. Akiyama, S., Yamada, A., Komaki, Y., Komaki, F., Micic, D., & Sakuraba, A. (2021). Efficacy and Safety of Monoclonal Antibodies Against Clostridioides difficile Toxins for Prevention of Recurrent Clostridioides difficile Infection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology, 55(1), 43–51. https://doi.org/10.1097/MCG.0000000000001330